From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31258 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2012 22:20:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 31250 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2012 22:20:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:20:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0OMJoO7004360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:19:50 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0OMJkCI026331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:19:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:49:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Pedro Alves , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Do not open Python scripts twice #2 [Re: [RFC] Crash sourcing Python script on Windows] Message-ID: <20120124221945.GA15222@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120123181125.GA26683@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F1DA92A.4020207@redhat.com> <20120123210850.GA28792@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120123221706.GA21051@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120124143609.GA20367@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120124194044.GA2855@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00855.txt.bz2 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:10:54 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > I thought we were talking about what should be in FSF GDB, not Fedora GDB. I admit I may not know what to imagine as a "generic distro". > s/impose a double open()/impose a double open() on windows/ > and skip the autoconf test to try to decide whether the libcs are compatible > (which as currently written you yourself have "fear[s]" of). > [the word "fear" can suggest far greater seriousness than is warranted > here, but it's your word :-)] > OTOH, if someone comes up with a succinct and solid test, great. Aha, OK, I am fine with that. Thanks, Jan