From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29412 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2012 16:25:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 29382 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2012 16:25:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:25:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0NGP4GT020129 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:25:05 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0NGP1OV017743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:25:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: Decouple "set confirm" from `from_tty'. Message-ID: <20120123162500.GA25825@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F194C6F.2080404@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F194C6F.2080404@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00777.txt.bz2 On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:13:51 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Comments? Just that I would prefer renaming to be a separate commit, otherwise it somehow complicates later regressions analysis etc. Sure very minor note. The real change here is negligible in size compared to the renaming. Thanks, Jan