From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18929 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2012 10:01:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 18874 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2012 10:01:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.113) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:06 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:04 -0000 Received: from d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.39.193) by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.147) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:02 -0000 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q0KA11mo2531352 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:02 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q0KA11Io013855 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:01:01 -0700 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id q0KA10VP013686; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:01:00 -0700 Message-Id: <201201201001.q0KA10VP013686@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:00:59 +0100 Subject: Re: [rfc v4][0/6] Remote /proc file access (Re: [rfc v3][0/6] Remote /proc file access) To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:02:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves), gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20120120055520.GK31383@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Jan 20, 2012 09:55:20 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12012010-0542-0000-0000-000000C40B9C Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I tested the patch series on mips-irix again, and I am happy to > > report that there are no regression. I haven't had time to > > test on sparc-solaris today, and I probably won't, but I will > > give it a shot tomorrow if I can (it's more difficult because > > I need to use another baseline and your patches do not apply > > cleanly). > > And I confirm no regression on sparc-solaris either using AdaCore's > testsuite. The goal of testing on sparc-solaris was to perform some > thread-specific testing, JIC, even if it's only with our testsuite. Thanks again for your support! I've now checked in the full patch series. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com