From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11152 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2012 05:55:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 11142 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2012 05:55:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:55:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24D82BAE11; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:55:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IXreL9Uwd6qa; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:55:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252E2BAD45; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:55:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 135D7145615; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:55:20 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc v4][0/6] Remote /proc file access (Re: [rfc v3][0/6] Remote /proc file access) Message-ID: <20120120055520.GK31383@adacore.com> References: <20120119063034.GF31383@adacore.com> <201201191000.q0JA04Bu008569@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20120119154733.GI31383@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120119154733.GI31383@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 > I tested the patch series on mips-irix again, and I am happy to > report that there are no regression. I haven't had time to > test on sparc-solaris today, and I probably won't, but I will > give it a shot tomorrow if I can (it's more difficult because > I need to use another baseline and your patches do not apply > cleanly). And I confirm no regression on sparc-solaris either using AdaCore's testsuite. The goal of testing on sparc-solaris was to perform some thread-specific testing, JIC, even if it's only with our testsuite. -- Joel