From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25492 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2012 06:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 25482 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2012 06:30:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:30:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AA92BADF9; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:30:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q5hf77niBYKk; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:30:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03D72BADF4; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:30:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDFCD145615; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:30:34 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc v3][0/6] Remote /proc file access Message-ID: <20120119063034.GF31383@adacore.com> References: <4F16B0F8.2020109@redhat.com> <201201181433.q0IEXcSF006214@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201201181433.q0IEXcSF006214@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00685.txt.bz2 > Joel, could you try one (hopefully) last time, using the patch below instead > of the original 5/6 patch? Thanks again! Apparently, patch 6 failed to apply on top of patch 5. Or maybe I didn't apply patch 5 correctly. It's a little too large for me to figure it out at a glance. Can you resend me the whole series the same way you sent it the first time. It was extremely convenient, because all I had to do was save your email in an mbox, and then use "git am" to apply them. That way, I know I'm applying them correctly. -- Joel