From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2282 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2012 18:44:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 2143 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2012 18:44:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:44:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0HIiaOk002660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:44:36 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.21]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0HIiW24022703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:44:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:02:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] New set auto-load-local-gdbinit + disable it by default Message-ID: <20120117184432.GA14443@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120117095552.GA6141@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120117162621.GA3883@host2.jankratochvil.net> <837h0q5i4u.fsf@gnu.org> <20120117175957.GA9415@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83zkdm41q8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83zkdm41q8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00617.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:34:39 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If we are renaming the file, why make the change? Because it is one of the multiple ways GDB is now exploitable and CVEs are open for it. Besides it is inconvenient but we do not agree on that part. Thanks, Jan