From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14753 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2012 12:15:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14744 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2012 12:15:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:15:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BFF2BB341; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:15:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OymxDH3ss2EJ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:15:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF692BB2EF; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:15:15 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06567145616; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:14:49 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Building GDB 7.3.92 with MinGW Message-ID: <20120113121449.GU31383@adacore.com> References: <83hb03e9sx.fsf@gnu.org> <20120111032441.GE31383@adacore.com> <83ty3zkh3g.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ty3zkh3g.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 > I like this alternative the best. Is the patch below OK to install, > including on the branch? It's OK with me for both HEAD and branch, with one possible suggestion: > > Index: gdb/README > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/README,v > retrieving revision 1.49 > diff -u -r1.49 README > --- gdb/README 4 Jan 2012 04:11:38 -0000 1.49 > +++ gdb/README 13 Jan 2012 10:52:12 -0000 > @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ > cd gdb-VERSION > ./configure > make > + cd gdb > + make install (or "make install-strip") > + > +Alternatively, install with > + > cp gdb/gdb /usr/local/bin/gdb (or wherever you want) Do we really want to preserve the alternate solution? We have more and more support files that come with GDB, so it's less and less likely to install a fully-functional GDB. (it is fine with me if we want to preserve it, just wanted to mention it). -- Joel