From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 872 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2012 13:38:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 756 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2012 13:38:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:38:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F0C2BB0FC; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:38:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aBjLzMOZ3JJi; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:38:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D852BB0DA; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:38:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB9C3145615; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:38:01 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Ulrich Weigand , Edjunior Barbosa Machado , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Ignore data minimal symbols for breakpoint linespecs Message-ID: <20120104133801.GW2730@adacore.com> References: <20111228151541.GM23376@adacore.com> <201201031844.q03IiMwV001269@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > Ulrich> But in the absence of such a solution, I'd still be in favor of > Ulrich> committing your patch as is, given that it fixes a serious > Ulrich> regression and doesn't look like it can make things worse. > > I agree. OK, thanks for taking a look, guys. Both patches are now in HEAD + branch... -- Joel