From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22032 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2012 18:02:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 22023 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2012 18:02:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:02:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0FF2BB0A7; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:02:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8bsMD1-XN5DS; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:02:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36A72BB0A1; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:02:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03E7C145615; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:01:59 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFA: Using year ranges in copyright notices... Message-ID: <20120103180158.GR2730@adacore.com> References: <20120103042431.GI2730@adacore.com> <20120103085234.GK2730@adacore.com> <4F02CEE3.6080909@codesourcery.com> <20120103101447.GL2730@adacore.com> <20120103160222.GN2730@adacore.com> <20120103175250.GA15915@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120103175250.GA15915@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 > This last sentence still contradict's the Joseph's comment / the FSF > statement: Yes, you are right. I'm doing everything too fast. I will send a new version tomorrow. > IIUC this would allow us to write 1986-2011 everywhere as the GDB package was > nontrivially modified each of these years. Just restating Joseph. That's what I understood too. But I just went with what update-copyright does for now. We can discuss the suggested simplification, but can we wait for next week/month/year? :-). -- Joel