From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5899 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2012 17:11:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 5887 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2012 17:11:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:11:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27032BAF0D; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y2j8y35uXQkh; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442082BAF08; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBC6F145615; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:11:21 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: commands.h and cli/cli-decode.h dups Message-ID: <20120103171121.GP2730@adacore.com> References: <4EF38DAD.3040106@earthlink.net> <20111223042053.GW23376@adacore.com> <20120103025256.GD2730@adacore.com> <4F02E0CC.5020408@gmail.com> <4F0300C0.8040004@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 > I am totally in favor of it. > I think duplication of this sort is a "worst practice". +1 -- Joel