From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7733 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2012 03:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 7719 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2012 03:15:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:15:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993932BADAB; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 22:15:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jZeCLGTZaC5R; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 22:15:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248362BADA9; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 22:15:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 458DC145615; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:15:11 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com, alves.ped@gmail.com Subject: Re: [7.4 regression] Stand-alone Cell debugging broken (Re: RFC: don't set the pspace on ordinary breakpoints) Message-ID: <20120103031511.GG2730@adacore.com> References: <201111181831.pAIIVJan019250@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <201201021818.q02IIAXd004892@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201201021818.q02IIAXd004892@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 > This is a serious regression that bascially means debugging stand- > alone SPU programs with a Cell/B.E. debugger is impossible. Thus > it would be really good to get this fixed before 7.4 is released ... Agreed. This is a blocking regression. > Does this look reasonable? Joel, would this be OK for 7.4 as well? The patch seems reasonable to me, but I have little experience in this area. It's OK for 7.4 unless someone finds a problem with it. > ChangeLog: > > * breakpoint.c (all_locations_are_pending): Consider locations > in program spaces executing during startup pending as well. -- Joel