From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23050 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 15:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 23041 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Dec 2011 15:16:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:15:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26532BAEC5; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:15:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oJesVEKpc7mj; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:15:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6702BAE37; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:15:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3F81145615; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:15:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:30:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Ignore data minimal symbols for breakpoint linespecs Message-ID: <20111228151541.GM23376@adacore.com> References: <1324548943-26819-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20111227041110.GA23376@adacore.com> <4EF9F1A1.2090302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111227164837.GI23376@adacore.com> <201112271708.pBRH8K1X019780@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20111228060200.GL23376@adacore.com> <4EFB0EE2.9090806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EFB0EE2.9090806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00869.txt.bz2 > excellent, I've tested it on ppc64 and it fixes all those regressions > I mentioned. Excellent. It would be nice to have someone else's feedback before I commit, as I am not very familiar with this sort of thing (I tend to have a simpler view of things, as the first patch demonstrated). -- Joel