From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17758 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2011 16:49:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 17748 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2011 16:49:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:48:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4319C2BB205; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:48:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rZ6trTjJcfQ0; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:48:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF2D2BB202; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:48:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E3BA145615; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:48:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Ignore data minimal symbols for breakpoint linespecs Message-ID: <20111227164837.GI23376@adacore.com> References: <1324548943-26819-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20111227041110.GA23376@adacore.com> <4EF9F1A1.2090302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EF9F1A1.2090302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00845.txt.bz2 > I noticed this patch unfortunately caused around 300 regressions in > the testsuite running on ppc64, with failures in several testcases > such as: Unfortunately, this is not a platform that I have access to, so it's probably going to be hard for me to determine what the problem is. Can you send me the logs of the tests that fail? Can you also include a log of the same tests, but before the patch is applied. (please, if possible, only include the testcases that regress) Perhaps we'll get lucky and the output will give us a clue. Otherwise, I'll probably need a hand from you. -- Joel