From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10229 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2011 09:53:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 10217 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2011 09:53:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:53:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBM9r8EJ019572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:53:08 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.60]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBM9quk2021394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:53:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: status on gdb-7.4 release... Message-ID: <20111222095255.GA12585@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20111222062604.GU7683@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111222062604.GU7683@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00771.txt.bz2 On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:26:04 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > 2. 7.3->7.4 s390x regressions > http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-12/msg00039.html > > I think that these ones were marked as being a latent bug > caused by the kernel. Correct? > http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00743.html Yes. I have replied now to the mail above. Thanks, Jan