From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7449 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2011 20:47:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 7441 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2011 20:47:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:47:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBLKlTD4027954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:47:30 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.60]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBLKlQTU019200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:47:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:20:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] gdb_gcore man/help/install [+doc] #2 Message-ID: <20111221204725.GA2643@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20111206002555.GA12329@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00745.txt.bz2 On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:38:27 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: > > Jan> From the practical point of view with the goal to generate only the > Jan> nroff .1 format I think the choice is clear from nroff, pod and > Jan> texinfo. The most simple format for maintenance is pod. Therefore > Jan> I did not use texi2pod at all. > > Thanks. I think it seems fine. > > We still need an info node for invoking gcore. In such case we have to drop the pod idea and write the man page in texinfo. (Unless we want to write it twice - in texinfo and in pod - but that does not make sense.) Thanks, Jan