Re: [commit, s390] Fix regression in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp [Re: [commit, s390] Proper handling of PSW address/mask everywhere]

Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-19T22:56:33Z

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:49:16 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Tested with no regression (fixing the callfuncs.exp one) on s390x (-m31,-m64).
> Committed to mainline and 7.4 branch.

Confirming it works, thanks.

There are yet some regressions of sigstep.exp, I will check them more:

step

-Breakpoint 3, main () at ./gdb.base/sigstep.c:79
-79 done = 0;
+Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
+handler (sig=14) at ./gdb.base/sigstep.c:30
+30 {
1: x/i $pc
-=> 0x800008e8 <main+384>: larl %r1,0x80001da0 <done>
-(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, skip handler; performing step
+=> 0x80000734 <handler>: stmg %r11,%r15,88(%r15)
+(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, skip handler; performing step

Regards,
Jan