From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16577 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 22:56:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16567 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 22:56:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:56:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJMuGt0012222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:56:16 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.60]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJMuCH8019546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:56:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:28:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit, s390] Fix regression in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp [Re: [commit, s390] Proper handling of PSW address/mask everywhere] Message-ID: <20111219225612.GA29085@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20111219194636.GA8429@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201112192149.pBJLnGgE010099@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112192149.pBJLnGgE010099@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00655.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:49:16 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Tested with no regression (fixing the callfuncs.exp one) on s390x (-m31,-m64). > Committed to mainline and 7.4 branch. Confirming it works, thanks. There are yet some regressions of sigstep.exp, I will check them more: step -Breakpoint 3, main () at ./gdb.base/sigstep.c:79 -79 done = 0; +Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. +handler (sig=14) at ./gdb.base/sigstep.c:30 +30 { 1: x/i $pc -=> 0x800008e8 : larl %r1,0x80001da0 -(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, skip handler; performing step +=> 0x80000734 : stmg %r11,%r15,88(%r15) +(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, skip handler; performing step Regards, Jan