From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13351 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 19:47:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 13341 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 19:47:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CP,TW_EG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:46:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJJke2n022832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:46:40 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.60]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBJJka8k019619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:46:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Regression gdb.base/callfuncs.exp for s390-on-s390x [Re: [commit, s390] Proper handling of PSW address/mask everywhere] Message-ID: <20111219194636.GA8429@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <201111301609.pAUG9PBd017686@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201111301609.pAUG9PBd017686@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00648.txt.bz2 On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:09:25 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: commit 176997b00bd777fb63505a20e918118271600f38 Author: Ulrich Weigand Date: Wed Nov 30 16:06:46 2011 +0000 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-11/msg00187.html > Tested with no regression on s390x-ibm-linux (with -m31 and -m64) and > on s390-ibm-linux, all both native and gdbserver. Fixes the above > step-resume-infcall.exp regressions. I see a regression for s390x with -m31, RHEL-6.2, kernel-2.6.32-220.el6.s390x. return 7 Make add return now? (y or n) y -#0 main () at ./gdb.base/callfuncs.c:655 -655 t_structs_c(struct_val1); -(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: back at main after return from call dummy breakpoint +Couldn't write registers: Invalid argument. +(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: back at main after return from call dummy breakpoint GDB reads PC as 0x8aaabbbb and triess to write it back as 0x0aaabbbb. I rather did not try to fix it. #0 error (string=0x80d7b3aa "%s.") at utils.c:810 #1 in perror_with_name (string=0x80daa600 "Couldn't write registers") at utils.c:1195 #2 in store_regs (regcache=0x8cb90eb0, tid=51221, regnum=1) at s390-nat.c:269 #3 in s390_linux_store_inferior_registers (ops=0x8c8ca340, regcache=0x8cb90eb0, regnum=1) at s390-nat.c:411 #4 in target_store_registers (regcache=0x8cb90eb0, regno=1) at target.c:3585 #5 in regcache_raw_write (regcache=0x8cb90eb0, regnum=1, buf=0x3ffff8d2b20 "") at regcache.c:877 #6 in regcache_cooked_write (regcache=0x8cb90eb0, regnum=1, buf=0x3ffff8d2b20 "") at regcache.c:889 #7 in regcache_restore (dst=0x8cb90eb0, cooked_read=0x8033a870 , cooked_read_context=0x8cc55e80) at regcache.c:358 #8 in regcache_cpy (dst=0x8cb90eb0, src=0x8cc55e80) at regcache.c:382 #9 in frame_pop (this_frame=0x8c9350e8) at frame.c:835 #10 in return_command (retval_exp=0x8c709777 "7", from_tty=0) at stack.c:2402 Thanks, Jan