From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5296 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2011 06:18:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5288 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2011 06:18:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:18:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0641C2BB18A; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:18:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kNPoULTsJiU1; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:18:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8063E2BB17C; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:18:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83A1F145615; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:17:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] YACC parsers Message-ID: <20111218061757.GD21915@adacore.com> References: <201112171937.pBHJbDhq010089@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112171937.pBHJbDhq010089@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2 > It may not be impossible to "fix" the OpenBSD yacc(4) here, but given > the fact that it supports the -p option to add a prefix to all the > relevant symbols that would be somewhat silly. Unfortunately, > changing the build infrastructure to use yacc -p isn't exactly > trivial. > > Opinions? FWIW, We are already using those #defines for other symbols, so I don't think that adding a few is going to make things worse. -- Joel