From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15659 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 15649 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2011 18:52:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:52:29 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RbctQ-0005uE-Kh from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:52:28 -0800 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:52:26 +0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 07/14] Expand %ITSET% in the prompt to the current I/T set. Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-13-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tom Tromey References: <20111128153742.17761.21459.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20111128153931.17761.19802.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112161852.20542.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:21:08, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> Not sure this is the way to go, or whether we'll only support this > Pedro> through python. This was simple enough to make sure I could work on > Pedro> the rest of the stuff without getting lost. I'll also make use of > Pedro> this in all examples in this series. > > I don't mind if you want to push some prompt stuff into the core, but I > think it would be better if done in a way that was compatible with the > Python prompt substitution code -- command-wise, > substitution-style-wise, and whatever else. I'm not certain about what you mean by this. The %% sustitution added applies after the python substitution, basically a sed before display. The result isn't stored anywhere. The "only" thing affected AFAICS is that to print '%', we'd have to escape it (e.g., %% => '%'), though I haven't implemented that. > That code hasn't seen a release yet, so it can be changed if need be. > (Though time is running out.) ETIMEDOUT -- Pedro Alves