From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-86093-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12291 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2011 16:47:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 12277 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2011 16:47:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:47:10 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBDGl7tx002582	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:47:07 -0500
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBDGl0ZE015850	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:47:03 -0500
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:23:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix PR remote/13492
Message-ID: <20111213164659.GA9179@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <201112051601.59664.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201112122030.25365.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111212203409.GA28419@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201112131612.30315.pedro@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201112131612.30315.pedro@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:12:30 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > (I do not agree for example with the lwp->stopped_by_watchpoint part as
> > multiple watchpoints may get hit on one stop which isn't handled well but that
> > is out of the scope of this discussion.)
> 
> I'm not 100% certain that is possible, but in any case, I think that
> even if we handled that, we wouldn't ever get as far as
> prepare_to_resume before handling all the multiple watchpoints.

True.


Thanks,
Jan