From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32226 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2011 16:06:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 32213 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2011 16:06:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:06:21 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RaUs0-0004Qy-1o from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:06:20 -0800 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:06:18 +0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: New tests to watch regions larger than a machine word (Re: [PATCH] PR threads/10729: x86 hw watchpoints and non-stop mode) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-13-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <201112051601.59664.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201112091614.06589.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83k465muqr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83k465muqr.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112131606.14816.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 On Friday 09 December 2011 19:05:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Pedro Alves > > > and also with watchpoints that watch regions longer than 4 > > > bytes on IA32 (and similarly on 64-bit hosts). > > > > This however doesn't seem to be tested anywhere. > > > > Here are a couple new tests to exercise that. They pass cleanly > > before and after the proposed patch, native and gdbserver linux, > > x86 and x86_64. > > Thanks. You're welcome. I've now checked in these new tests. -- Pedro Alves