From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27331 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2011 12:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27321 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2011 12:42:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:42:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA62E2BB094; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:42:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GvZN3GX-jDwS; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:42:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B68B2BB031; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:42:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B75A145615; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:42:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types] Message-ID: <20111211124213.GO21915@adacore.com> References: <20111205081911.GG28486@adacore.com> <20111209171630.GA30059@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111209171937.GA30594@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111209215319.GA5132@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111210160145.GA7261@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211024742.GN21915@adacore.com> <20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 > IMO it depends on whether one considers "our" to be just GDB or > whether "our" is the whole GNU Toolchain. Ah, I see. That's a valid question. For me, if a contributor who knows only GDB wanted to go hunt for bugs, I would look at the KFAIL failures. This is why I would say it's convenient to use KFAIL for GDB bugs only. But, in all honesty, it's never happened that I looked at the KFAIL list for inspiration, in all honesty, it's never happened that I looked at the KFAIL list for inspiration. So it's really OK with me either way. -- Joel