From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85996-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4373 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2011 21:26:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 4358 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2011 21:26:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:25:44 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB9LPdcd022420	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:25:40 -0500
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB9LPUau017666	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:25:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:54:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos  [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
Message-ID: <20111209212530.GA4306@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <m31usz3la9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201111251608.pAPG81oE002175@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111202011800.GA23680@host2.jankratochvil.net> <m3hb19ea0e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3hb19ea0e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2

On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:00:01 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Unfortunately, a Tcl proc returns its last computed value if there is no
> explicit return.  So, this caused:

With the patch of mine it either returns the same value as before or it
returns value 0.  And I do not have the problem reproducible, where to
reproduce it?


Thanks,
Jan