From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24626 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2011 20:50:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24618 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2011 20:50:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:50:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB9Ko2dY011697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:50:02 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB9KnqL4012467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:49:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Crash regression for gdb.base/ending-run.exp [Re: creating the gdb-7.4 branch tomorrow (?)] Message-ID: <20111209204951.GA32371@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20111205081911.GG28486@adacore.com> <20111209164653.GA22642@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:39:51 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I'm checking in the appended. The patch looks OK to me, thanks. Jan