From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4184 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2011 12:46:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 4174 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2011 12:46:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:46:22 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RXuPa-0000jm-HK from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 04:46:18 -0800 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:46:16 +0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-13-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: hal9000ed2k@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com References: <201112042100.17292.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83fwgzbrp9.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83fwgzbrp9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112061246.15377.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 On Monday 05 December 2011 03:52:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Pedro Alves > > $ pwd > > /foo/bar > > $ gcc a/b.c > > > > If the debug info supports a notion of compilation directory (DW_AT_comp_dir > > in dwarf), the full name is /foo/bar/a/b.c and the compilation > > directory is /foo/bar. The no-compilation-directory option > > would the show a/b.c . > > > > I'd rather have a positive option, rather than a negative one (no-|without-), > > but I'm failing to find a better name. I thought of "relative", > > but that's not entirely accurate -- it can be a full path too. I can live > > with no-compilation-directory. Just saying I tried and failed. > > How about `relative-to-compilation-directory'? Or just `relative' > (since we use `full', not `full-absolute-file-name')? Hmm, yeah, explaining "relative" in terms of "relative to compilation directory" makes it okay, I suppose. -- Pedro Alves