From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24639 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 02:28:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 24625 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 02:28:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:27:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8BF2BAF6C; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DRJvPC8iZOPS; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A2C2BAF59; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:27:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 975BB145615; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:27:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Message-ID: <20111129022729.GK24943@adacore.com> References: <20111123163917.GA13809@adacore.com> <20111123232406.GQ13809@adacore.com> <20111124105603.GA91879@adacore.com> <20111124163304.GR13809@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2 Hi Tom, > Here are the latest patches. Thanks again for sending the patch. Overally, with a few changes here and there, I am noticing that we're getting very close to what the AdaCore debugger is capable of in terms of pure-Ada functionality, and I am very please by that result. To avoid having one email thread discussing about everything, I think I'll make one reply per topic. You've fixed a couple of the things I wanted to talk about, so there might not be many. We still have a couple of regressions, and I'll let you know which ones I am planing on working on first, so that, should you decide to look at some of them, our efforts do not collide. -- Joel