From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2755 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2011 21:52:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 2747 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2011 21:52:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:52:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D432BB186; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:52:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q+2fl1b6azlx; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:52:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2837F2BB182; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:52:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7752C145615; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:52:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrey Smirnov Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Notes on -Wshadow patches Message-ID: <20111127215221.GG24943@adacore.com> References: <877h2l7nth.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2 > Not that that I'm an exprt on git, but, no, I am unaware of such > functionality. But it doesn't matter, since, as I said, commit > messages already contain what is to be later added to the changelog, i > just didn't add that to the actual ChangeLog file and therefore it is > not in the diff. You don't need to worry about this - ChangeLog entries do not need to be included in the patch. All they do is create conflicts when someone tries to apply your patch to his tree. -- Joel