From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26871 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 18:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26863 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2011 18:42:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:41:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ADB2BB23E; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ztOQAo7PYFQK; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E912BB181; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:41:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D8192145615; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:41:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand , Mark Kettenis , andrew.smirnov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings Message-ID: <20111123184152.GB13809@adacore.com> References: <201111231640.pANGefc4031803@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <201111231820.40486.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201111231820.40486.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 > There was this gcc patch > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/244771 > > to stop -Wshadow from complaning about shadowing of symbols in system > headers, but it doesn't seem to have been applied, though it was okayed. I'll send Alan a ping... That being said, because some compilers can warn, I think it might be best to avoid the clash anyways. -- Joel