From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85445-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5492 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2011 16:46:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 5482 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2011 16:46:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:45:49 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pANGjM8j023729;	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:45:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id pANGjKIW017394;	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:45:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201111231645.pANGjKIW017394@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: vapier@gentoo.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, andrew.smirnov@gmail.com,        mpolacek@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20111122160539.GA22283@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker	on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:05:39 -0800)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings
References: <878vn88fw3.fsf@gmail.com> <4ECBA525.1010801@redhat.com> <CAHQ1cqHNswA2d5dDQsiu3i0kGe6rDFs+izUNYoWcvcf4NaLd0Q@mail.gmail.com> <201111221027.52484.vapier@gentoo.org> <20111122160539.GA22283@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00622.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:05:39 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > please condense down your patches if you resend.  there's way too many
> > little tiny ones that really should be squashed into a single
> > changeset.
> 
> In my view, if the patches can be checked in independently, then
> it is a good thing that they are split. Imagine the situation where
> one of these changes is bad, we'd then be able to revert that one
> patch, rather than fixing by hand.

But sending 388 seperate changes is insane.