From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85297-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19339 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2011 14:54:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 19329 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Nov 2011 14:54:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:54:22 +0000
Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1RR3M6-0004cK-07 from pedro_alves@mentor.com 	for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:54:22 -0800
Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);	 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:54:19 +0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] Test cases
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:54:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-12-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <4EC20E2E.6010402@codesourcery.com> <201111171207.42605.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4EC51589.1010501@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC51589.1010501@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201111171454.17168.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2

On Thursday 17 November 2011 14:09:13, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 08:07 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > 
> > Note that "$gdb_prompt $" match takes precedence over
> > gdb_test_multiple's internal "Ending remote debugging.*$gdb_prompt $"
> > match.
> 
> Is this precedence determined by the order of appending ${code} in proc
> gdb_test_multiple?

Yes.  You end up with the equivalent of:

   gdb_expect $tmt {
     -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
     }
     -re "Ending remote debugging.*$gdb_prompt $" {
   	 }
   }

And the first regex that matches (top to bottom order) wins.

> > Want to try that?
> 
> Sure, they work.  Updated patch as you suggested.

Okay.

-- 
Pedro Alves