From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85264-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1114 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 19:04:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 1014 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2011 19:04:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:03:23 +0000
Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1RQklW-0006Jn-O0 from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:03:22 -0800
Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);	 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:03:20 +0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] Document
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:04:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-12-generic; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Luis Machado <luis_gustavo@mentor.com>
References: <4EC20E2E.6010402@codesourcery.com> <83d3cte2rr.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC32A42.7090500@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC32A42.7090500@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201111161903.18043.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2

On Wednesday 16 November 2011 03:13:06, Yao Qi wrote:
> +Pending tracepoints are not downloaded to target and not installed until

to the target

> +they are resolved.  The resolution of pending tracepoints requires
> +@value{GDBN} support.  

This sentence confused me a little.   Everything in GDB requires GDB
support.  :-)  I suggest joining it with the following sentence, like
say:

 The resolution of pending tracepoints requires
 @value{GDBN} support---in the remote target, when @value{GDBN}
 disconnects from the remote stub, pending tracepoints still exist
 but can not be resolved while @value{GDBN} is disconnected.

> +disconnects from remote stub, pending tracepoints still exists but can
               from the remote stub                  still exist

-- 
Pedro Alves