Re: [rfc][3/3] Remote core file generation: memory map

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Wednesday 09 November 2011 18:27:07, Ulrich Weigand wrote:

> OK.  In the meantime, I've noticed the discussion going on in parallel
> on the "info core mappings" commands.  If we implement this, we have
> the somewhat weird situation that we can show mappings for native
> processes and for core files, but not for processes attached to remotely,
> even if the target is also Linux ...
> 
> It would appear to me that this command actually just needs the very
> same data I need here for the generate-core-file command, namely the
> current list of memory mappings.
> 
> If we create a new target object for VMA memory mappings, maybe we
> ought to then have a standard "info mappings" (or the like) command
> implemented in GDB *common code* that works likewise on native,
> core file, *and* also gdbserver targets; in fact, on all targets
> that provide that new target object (which may need to be a bit
> richer, e.g. provide mapped file names as well)?

Sounds like a good idea indeed.

-- 
Pedro Alves