From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9241 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2011 19:23:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 9227 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2011 19:23:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:23:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2542BB205; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fX-Js4OJ8jUJ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B3F2BB1FA; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D788145615; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jeremy Bennett Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: preparing the upcoming GDB 7.4 release Message-ID: <20111109192309.GR14508@adacore.com> References: <20111107175402.GI14508@adacore.com> <1320866227.23325.543.camel@laria> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1320866227.23325.543.camel@laria> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 > You may have seen that the Adapteva Epiphany architecture has recently > been accepted into binutils and GCC. I hope we can get the GDB port into > 7.4 - I'm still working on nailing a bunch of regression issues before > submitting. Unless you are touching some of the core code (the parts that are not target or arch specific), it's usually OK to accept a port even after the branch was made. The little changes to configure.ac etc are usually simple enough that we're confident that they are safe. -- Joel