From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22755 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2011 15:21:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 22745 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2011 15:21:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:21:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D192BAB7F; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:21:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id P4iixZ7-2C38; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:21:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787CF2BAB4C; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:21:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A06F7145615; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:20:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: remove gdbarch from struct breakpoint Message-ID: <20111107152058.GD14508@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > This patch removes the 'gdbarch' field from struct breakpoint. > > In most cases, it is sufficient to replace the use of this field with > the location's gdbarch instead. In fact, I think the cases in > tracepoint.c where this is not done are probably latent bugs. I think that makes sense. I am trying to figure out how a breakpoint could have a gdbarch that made some sort of sense when the breakpoint has two locations and each location had a different gdbarch from the other.... -- Joel