From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29634 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2011 20:01:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29623 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2011 20:01:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:01:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA1K1Hgg031715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:01:17 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-23.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.23]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1K1Fqj025855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:01:16 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA1K1Ek9019868; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:01:14 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA1K1Ein019867; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:01:14 +0100 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:01:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey , Marek Polacek Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [patch] testsuite: MI: racy results in async mode #2 Message-ID: <20111101200114.GA15541@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB01DA9.9080207@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:19:38 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote: > I think if it works then it is clearly better than what we have now. OK, checked in so that I can further watch the racy behavior: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-11/msg00005.html > One other idea would be to send an "output" command so that you could > match some known output to sync up correctly. I'm not sure if this > would always work though. >From some level of difficulty on I would rather prefer the MI parser. On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:26:17 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > This fixes those 5 FAILs I've seen. Tested with writew.so on x86_64-unknown- > linux-gnu. Great, thanks. Regards, Jan