From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21596 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2011 00:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 21511 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2011 00:34:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:34:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9V0YNS4029790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:34:23 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-23.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.23]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9V0YLon030142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:34:22 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9V0YKMf030978; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:34:20 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9V0YJvY030973; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:34:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: don't set the pspace on ordinary breakpoints Message-ID: <20111031003419.GA22990@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:20:38 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Built and regtested on x86-64 F15, but only when applied on top of the > previous patch. While I find the patch OK I have a regression on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora16pre-linux-gnu: run^M Starting program: gdb/testsuite.unix.-m64/gdb.multi/bkpt-multi-exec ^M +Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: No source file named crashme.c.^M foll-exec is about to execl(crashme)...^M -process 30058 is executing new program: gdb/testsuite.unix.-m64/gdb.multi/crashme^M +process 13203 is executing new program: gdb/testsuite.unix.-m64/gdb.multi/crashme^M +Oh no, a bug!^M ^M -Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe1d8) at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/crashme.c:9^M -9 printf ("Oh no, a bug!\n"); /* set breakpoint here */^M -(gdb) PASS: gdb.multi/bkpt-multi-exec.exp: run +Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.^M +0x0000000000400519 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe1b8) at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/crashme.c:11^M +11 return *foo;^M +(gdb) FAIL: gdb.multi/bkpt-multi-exec.exp: run BTW the term "ordinary breakpoint" could be defined somewhere but it is already used in FSF GDB HEAD. Thanks, Jan