From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84662-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7689 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2011 17:27:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 7669 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2011 17:27:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:26:35 +0000
Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1RIklm-0006Qj-Sv from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:26:35 -0700
Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);	 Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:26:30 +0100
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/commit/ia64-linux] Allow libunwind to fetch register 0
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:37:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
References: <1319561563-20201-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201110251818.43576.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201110251818.43576.pedro@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201110251826.24970.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2

On Tuesday 25 October 2011 18:18:42, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > +    {
> > +      const char r0_value[8] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> > +                             0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00};
> 
> FYI, in C, this is equivalent to:
> 
>         const char r0_value[8] = { 0 };
> 
> I'd write it as:
> 
>         const char zero[8] = { 0 };
> 

Actually, const s/char/gdb_byte/ too.  :-)

-- 
Pedro Alves