From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15708 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2011 14:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 15698 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2011 14:47:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:47:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8102BB042; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id K79VmuMxX7xQ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068572BB014; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:47:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E01A145615; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:47:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand , eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)] Message-ID: <20111025144735.GP19246@adacore.com> References: <201110102256.34728.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111011233417.GA17487@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111025142647.GA12860@adacore.com> <20111025143440.GA29984@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111025143440.GA29984@host1.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 > > Why do we error out if makeinfo is not available? > > As the GDB build errored out by some error later anyway which was moreover not > understandable to the users. I see, it's `make install' from bfd/ that is failing. One of these days, I will have to take care of that. We used to do much better in GDB, and now it feels like we've regressed. But, as you correctly point out, from the user's perspective, things are equivalent. -- Joel