From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18325 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2011 20:51:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 18316 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2011 20:51:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:51:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9IKpCwK015043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:51:12 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9IKpAvt030710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:51:12 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9IKp9cP031998; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:51:09 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9IKp8XN031993; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:51:08 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:52:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov Subject: [patch 1/3] Code cleanup: strcpy + strlen -> sprintf Message-ID: <20111018205108.GA31533@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 Hi, I do not understand much the reasons, maybe a fear about violating C sequence points. I hope it is not due to incompatible sprintf on MS-Windows CE or some such gdbserver platform. I would check it in with the other patches depending on this. Thanks, Jan gdb/gdbserver/ 2011-10-18 Jan Kratochvil * server.c (handle_qxfer_libraries): Replace strcpy and strlen pairs by sprintf. --- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c @@ -960,18 +960,11 @@ handle_qxfer_libraries (const char *annex, struct dll_info *dll = (struct dll_info *) dll_ptr; char *name; - strcpy (p, " name); - strcpy (p, name); + p += sprintf (p, " " + "\n", + name, (long) dll->base_addr); free (name); - p = p + strlen (p); - strcpy (p, "\">base_addr); - p = p + strlen (p); - strcpy (p, "\"/>\n"); - p = p + strlen (p); } strcpy (p, "\n");