From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14780 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2011 17:26:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 14772 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2011 17:26:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:26:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6672BB108; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:26:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ve-Lf3r3Us2h; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:26:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF922BB0EF; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:26:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C39F145615; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:26:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:28:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, toolchain-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: dv-cfi: include stdbool.h Message-ID: <20111017172603.GY19246@adacore.com> References: <1310410693-20883-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20111017165024.GB17942@adacore.com> <201110171306.34450.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110171306.34450.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2 > > What we should do is get rid of uses of true and false, and use the > > typical zero/nonzero values instead. I think that the blackfin header > > and code should be cleaned up accordingly as well. > > ah, this would make me sad. would a configure check for stdbool.h be > acceptable ? But what would you do if stdbool.h is not available? Wouldn't that complicate the code in the end? -- Joel