From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25324 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 20:33:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 25316 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Oct 2011 20:33:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:33:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9CKXXpj009857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:33:33 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.16]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9CKXVE4006287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:33:33 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9CKXUVM023951; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:33:30 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9CKXTfl023950; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:33:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:33:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [patch] Fix internal error on optimized-out values (regression by me) Message-ID: <20111012203329.GA23721@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110926191132.GA30401@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111010205407.GA5193@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110102240.28440.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110102240.28440.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:40:28 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > IMO, this is just like "p s.f", printing when the whole > of `s' is unavailable. From the unavailable.exp test: > > print globalstruct.memberf > $7 = > (gdb) PASS: gdb.trace/unavailable.exp: collect globals: print globalstruct.memberf > print globalstruct.memberd > print globalstruct > $9 = {memberc = , memberi = , memberf = , memberd = } > > It just happens that today, we only support either wholy > optimized-out values, or wholly not optimized-out values. This would suggest the user-visible behavior should be more the former patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-09/msg00449.html printing In either patch case when partially- values get implemented the code needs to be changed anyway. > and that ((struct) ).field will need to be able to be > . Yes. Thanks, jan