From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16579 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2011 15:16:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 16559 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2011 15:15:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_FRT_CLICK X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:15:43 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RDHZu-0001hG-Ih from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:15:42 -0700 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:15:40 +0100 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)] Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Ulrich Weigand , eliz@gnu.org References: <201110101357.p9ADvmvK012977@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111010145749.GA9444@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20111010145749.GA9444@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110101615.39047.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 On Monday 10 October 2011 15:57:49, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > +@ifset HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK > +The code can have possible execution paths > +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}c@click{}d@click{}f} or > +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}e@click{}f}, @value{GDBN} cannot find which > one from the inferior state. > +@end ifset Leaving a piece of the manual out like that is not okay. If this feature is too new for the currently required makeinfo version (which is it, btw?), we have two real choices: 1. bump the minimum required makeinfo version so we can use it 2. don't use the new feature We could also have an @else that spells that bit out without using @click/@arrow, but I don't think the benefits of a clicksequence (or @arrow) justify the extra maintenance burden. IMO. -- Pedro Alves