From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27466 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 18:14:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 27458 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 18:14:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:13:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2192BAB3D; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:13:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id N1xiLXPea-12; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E32BAADB; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60320145615; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:13:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Vladimir Prus , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] Message-ID: <20111003181344.GG19246@adacore.com> References: <20110718201852.GG30496@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110902170745.GA22738@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110032105.17607.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20111003174320.GA6944@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111003174320.GA6944@host1.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > I would like to restate that primarily I do not know a case when > @entry values are relevant for FEs and therefore for MI. FEs > typically rebuild the inferior for debugging with -O0 -g and therefore > @entry values are not present at all. I know of at least a couple of projects where they debug their optimized build routinely. The fact that they use a FE or not is not relevant in their case. -- Joel