From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15044 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2011 10:54:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 15036 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2011 10:54:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:54:21 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1R9EFx-0006Pu-2l from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:54:21 -0700 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:54:19 +0100 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Rename "info definitions"? Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Matt Rice , Doug Evans References: <20110921190419.542512461A9@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109291154.17349.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00519.txt.bz2 On Thursday 29 September 2011 03:13:58, Matt Rice wrote: > +info macro [-all] [--] MACRO > + The info macro command has new options -all and --. The first or printing > + all definitions of a macro. The second for explicitly specifying the end > + of arguments and the beginning of the macro name. Why do we need [--]? MACROS can't start with `-', can they? -- Pedro Alves