Re: [rfc, gdbserver] Support hardware watchpoints on ARM

Pedro Alves
2011-09-21T14:29:21Z

On Wednesday 21 September 2011 15:26:30, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 September 2011 14:57:15, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > > Well, since this is global system property that is actually only
> > > queried once and then returned from a cache, adding a LWP argument
> > > would appear to be somewhat misleading ...
> >
> > We can always just document what the argument means :-) In this
> > case, it'd serve as currently stopped LWP to run ptrace on in case
> > the cache is not set yet.
>
> That still seems odd to me :-) I'd rather make the caching explicit,
> e.g. by retrieving the information once in arm_arch_setup and then
> just always using it.

Works for me. :-)

--
Pedro Alves