From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27616 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2011 14:29:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27604 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2011 14:29:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:29:04 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1R6NnL-0000Vm-DB from pedro_alves@mentor.com ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:29:03 -0700 Received: from scottsdale.localnet ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:29:01 +0100 From: Pedro Alves To: "Ulrich Weigand" Subject: Re: [rfc, gdbserver] Support hardware watchpoints on ARM Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:34:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, patches@linaro.org References: <201109212126.p8LLQPEn014621@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201109212126.p8LLQPEn014621@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109211528.59723.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 21 September 2011 15:26:30, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 September 2011 14:57:15, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > > Well, since this is global system property that is actually only > > > queried once and then returned from a cache, adding a LWP argument > > > would appear to be somewhat misleading ... > > > > We can always just document what the argument means :-) In this > > case, it'd serve as currently stopped LWP to run ptrace on in case > > the cache is not set yet. > > That still seems odd to me :-) I'd rather make the caching explicit, > e.g. by retrieving the information once in arm_arch_setup and then > just always using it. Works for me. :-) -- Pedro Alves