From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83568-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17265 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2011 17:47:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 17256 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2011 17:47:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_SV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:47:24 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p88HlCSW017669;	Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:47:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id p88HlA7B001155;	Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:47:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:22:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201109081747.p88HlA7B001155@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
CC: pedro@codesourcery.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20110908174332.GA15583@host1.jankratochvil.net> (message from	Jan Kratochvil on Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:43:32 +0200)
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix x32, introduce is_amd64_regs_target
References:  <20110908174332.GA15583@host1.jankratochvil.net>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:43:32 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:53:34 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > I don't believe that triplet was ever accepted.
> +
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:57:04 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Where?  Neither the config.guess/config.sub in the gcc svn repo, nor
> > the one in the src cvs repo will ever return such a triplet.
> 
> OK, I Googled some posted patches and assumed it is the reality, I agree there
> isn't x32 vendor in the FSF repositories.
> 
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:01:41 +0200, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > I am using x86_64-x32-linux* for x32.  Instead, I
> > am using x86_64-*-linux* with sizeof (long) == 4.
> 
> Updated the comment to:
> +# Return 1 if target has x86_64 registers - either amd64 or x32.
> +# x32 target identifies as x86_64-*-linux*, therefore it cannot be determined
> +# just from the target string.
> +proc is_amd64_regs_target {} {
> 
> Checked in.

Thanks!