Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PR cli/13110
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109071512.01995.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22QZz9oeoLGNsJFLiJjKZE7tn_ByhkFmP5GvzE7hMGtBdA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 07 September 2011 01:45:36, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-09/msg00019.html>
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-linux and applied.
> >
> > Repeating what I said on gdb@, I'm now wondering if we actually ever
> > need the registers_changed call here or in wait_for_inferior
> > nowadays --- we flush threads' register caches when we resume
> > them (target_resume).

> > Index: src/gdb/infrun.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- src.orig/gdb/infrun.c       2011-09-05 15:50:49.000000000 +0100
> > +++ src/gdb/infrun.c    2011-09-05 15:57:10.693964411 +0100
> > @@ -2749,7 +2749,9 @@ fetch_inferior_event (void *client_data)
> >      switches threads anyway).  If we didn't do this, a spurious
> >      delayed event in all-stop mode would make the user lose the
> >      selected frame.  */
> > -  if (non_stop || is_executing (inferior_ptid))
> > +  if (non_stop
> > +      || (!ptid_equal (inferior_ptid, null_ptid)
> > +         && is_executing (inferior_ptid)))
> >     registers_changed ();
> >
> >   make_cleanup_restore_integer (&execution_direction);
> >
> 
> The code may be to additionally check if there's a selected thread,
> but when I read it I think "When is null_ptid ever executing?".
> 
> Comment in the code is required IMO.

How about removing the registers_changed calls once and
for all?

Tested on x86_64-linux native|gdbserver x sync|async.

-- 
Pedro Alves

2011-09-07  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>

	gdb/
	* infrun.c (prepare_for_detach, wait_for_inferior)
	(fetch_inferior_event): Don't flush the register cache.
	* remote.c (struct stop_reply) <regcache>: Add comment.

---
 gdb/infrun.c |   33 ---------------------------------
 gdb/remote.c |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Index: src/gdb/infrun.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/infrun.c	2011-09-07 13:21:46.877976256 +0100
+++ src/gdb/infrun.c	2011-09-07 14:41:52.954338077 +0100
@@ -2580,14 +2580,6 @@ prepare_for_detach (void)
 
       overlay_cache_invalid = 1;
 
-      /* We have to invalidate the registers BEFORE calling
-	 target_wait because they can be loaded from the target while
-	 in target_wait.  This makes remote debugging a bit more
-	 efficient for those targets that provide critical registers
-	 as part of their normal status mechanism.  */
-
-      registers_changed ();
-
       if (deprecated_target_wait_hook)
 	ecs->ptid = deprecated_target_wait_hook (pid_ptid, &ecs->ws, 0);
       else
@@ -2657,14 +2649,7 @@ wait_for_inferior (void)
     {
       struct cleanup *old_chain;
 
-      /* We have to invalidate the registers BEFORE calling target_wait
-	 because they can be loaded from the target while in target_wait.
-	 This makes remote debugging a bit more efficient for those
-	 targets that provide critical registers as part of their normal
-	 status mechanism.  */
-
       overlay_cache_invalid = 1;
-      registers_changed ();
 
       if (deprecated_target_wait_hook)
 	ecs->ptid = deprecated_target_wait_hook (waiton_ptid, &ecs->ws, 0);
@@ -2734,26 +2719,8 @@ fetch_inferior_event (void *client_data)
        running any breakpoint commands.  */
     make_cleanup_restore_current_thread ();
 
-  /* We have to invalidate the registers BEFORE calling target_wait
-     because they can be loaded from the target while in target_wait.
-     This makes remote debugging a bit more efficient for those
-     targets that provide critical registers as part of their normal
-     status mechanism.  */
-
   overlay_cache_invalid = 1;
 
-  /* But don't do it if the current thread is already stopped (hence
-     this is either a delayed event that will result in
-     TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE, or it's an event for another thread (and
-     we always clear the register and frame caches when the user
-     switches threads anyway).  If we didn't do this, a spurious
-     delayed event in all-stop mode would make the user lose the
-     selected frame.  */
-  if (non_stop
-      || (!ptid_equal (inferior_ptid, null_ptid)
-	  && is_executing (inferior_ptid)))
-    registers_changed ();
-
   make_cleanup_restore_integer (&execution_direction);
   execution_direction = target_execution_direction ();
 
Index: src/gdb/remote.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/remote.c	2011-09-07 13:21:46.877976256 +0100
+++ src/gdb/remote.c	2011-09-07 14:41:52.954338077 +0100
@@ -4898,6 +4898,10 @@ struct stop_reply
 
   struct target_waitstatus ws;
 
+  /* Expedited registers.  This makes remote debugging a bit more
+     efficient for those targets that provide critical registers as
+     part of their normal status mechanism (as another roundtrip to
+     fetch them is avoided).  */
   VEC(cached_reg_t) *regcache;
 
   int stopped_by_watchpoint_p;


  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-07 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-05 16:50 Pedro Alves
2011-09-07  1:29 ` Doug Evans
2011-09-07 14:28   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-09-07 17:42     ` Doug Evans
2011-09-14 13:40       ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201109071512.01995.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox