From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3507 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2011 12:04:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3471 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2011 12:04:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:03:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 4256 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2011 12:03:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO scottsdale.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 2 Sep 2011 12:03:55 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Doc: make python function/method descriptions look as in Python Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:26:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Paul_Koning@dell.com References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD015343BFAE@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD015343BFAE@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109021303.53311.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Thursday 01 September 2011 21:52:59, Paul_Koning@dell.com wrote: > @findex gdb.parse_and_eval > -@defun parse_and_eval expression > +@defun parse_and_eval (expression) > Parse @var{expression} as an expression in the current language, evaluate it, and return the result as a @code{gdb.Value}. > @var{expression} must be a string. > @@ -21070,7 +21070,7 @@ > convenience variable (@pxref{Convenience Vars}) as a @code{gdb.Value}. > @end defun > > -@findex gdb.post_event > +@findex gdb.post_event () > @defun post_event event Judging from the other changes, I believe you meant to update defun instead of findex here. IMO, it would make sense to explicit the module as well, like in the findex. It's how e.g., looks. -- Pedro Alves